The public debate of “ Which is better , Chicago - style or New York - style pizza ? ” will probably never properly be settled , at least not before humans ’s mutually ensure destruction . There is a immense group of people – mostly from New York – that claim that deep dish is objectively defective , and that the East Coast thin crust pizza style is inherently superior . And one of their preferred argumentation to trot out every sentence this disputation come up , is the same title that “ cryptic cup of tea is n’t pizza . ” The talking compass point is rearing , echoed by slender - crust lovers everywhere , include Jon Stewart . They call it casserole , or pie , or as Stewart famously put it , a tauntaun carcase . Us Chicagoans – in our Sisyphean duty to explain why deep peach merit to subsist – are quick to brush these claims off as simply untrue , magnification of the unenlightened people that plainly do not understand . But are they , really ?
Everyone ’s entitled to their opinion , but only one opinion ultimately matters and that go to Lady Liberty . Regardless of how safe Chicago deep saucer is , does it have enough in common with the platonic ideal of “ pizza pie ” to be classify under that umbrella ? To happen out , we ’re putting it on trial , with the help of local lawyer Nicolette Ward . While she does n’t specialize in pizza pie law , she did calibrate magna cum laude from Chicago - Kent College of Law , will be joining the jurisprudence offices of Romanucci & Blandin very soon , and perhaps most importantly , she fit to give her legal counsel to us pro bono .
So , yes , deep smasher is great . But can it be considered pizza in a sound mother wit ? Court is now in session .
Brent Hofacker/Shutterstock
The first full stop to make in favour of the criminal prosecution in Skeptics v. Deep Dish is that , unluckily , there is a bit of effectual precedent for claiming that deep dish is , in fact , not pizza pie . Since law is necessarily beholden to authority , deep dish has an uphill battle in motor lodge , since we will first need to dispute this precedent if we are to even bring this causa before a panel . Ward states :
" We ca n’t talk about pizza law without addressing the elephant in the room : there is only one prior opinion on the subject , and it does n’t count sound for Chicago . Justice Antonin Scalia sway pizza jurisprudence to its core in January 2011,when he toldCalifornia Lawyermagazine : ' I cerebrate [ New York style pizza pie ] is … boundlessly salutary than Chicago pizza pie . You screw these deep - dish pizzas - it ’s not pizza . It ’s very in effect , but … call it tomato plant Proto-Indo European or something . … I ’m a diehard , what can I tell you ? ' "
concord to Ward , anybody conversant with Scalia ’s previous Supreme Court vox populi should not be surprised to hear this . Scalia was known for being a Constitutional Originalist , a man who viewed the meaning of the Old Ironsides as immutable and secure in time at the moment it was written , even as the earthly concern changed around it . His sound opinions , therefore , came from a very narrowly and clearly set interpretation of Constitutional law . The question then becomes , what did Scalia view as the inherent apotheosis of pizza ? What is its platonic ideal , against which everything arrogate to be pizza can be judged ?
Sean Cooley/Thrillist
This is the net nail in the casket for the prosecution . For Scalia , pizza pie start out and ended at Neapolitan - dash pizza pie . Since deep dish pizza is n’t Neapolitan , it ’s not real pizza . Case closed .
fortunately enough , Scalia made an appearance at Chicago - Kent College of Law in October of 2011 to expound upon his originalist pizza perspective .
“ I do indeed wish so - predict ‘ deep dish pizza ’ … It ’s very tasty , ” remarked Scalia . “ But it should not be called ‘ pizza . ’ It should be called ‘ a tomato Proto-Indo European . ’ Real pizza pie is Neapolitan . It is thin . It is chewy and crispy , OK ? ”
Flickr/Kenyaboy7
Ward notes that this rendition of pizza pie , again , makes sentience give Scalia ’s custom - rooted views . In Scalia ’s mind , pizza pie is immutable , and any American bastardisation of its true form ( which , again , for Scalia , is Neapolitan ) , is inherently not pizza pie .
This is the last nail in the casket for the prosecution . For Scalia , pizza began and terminate at Neapolitan - style pizza . Since abstruse dish pizza pie is n’t Neapolitan , it ’s not literal pizza pie . Case closed . Deep dish is hangdog , and it is , legally , not pizza .
But the story does n’t end there . Ward notes that back in 2010 , the European Union gave Neapolitan pizza pie a “ Traditional Specialty guarantee ” legal status . This is passably much a trademark for the food for thought and drunkenness industry , and sets standards for how certain traditional foods and drinks can be made – like a more intense version of the restrictions that bar wineries from calling a effervescent wine-coloured Champagne if the wine-colored was n’t made from grapes from the Champagne region .
This means that there areintense restrictionsfor what can and can not be considered Neapolitan pizza pie . The pizza must be made with San Marzano tomatoes , fresh mozzarella cheese made with buffalo Milk River , and the deepness of the pizza must be 2 - 3 cm at the edge and .4 atomic number 96 at the center . It also must be “ tender , elastic , and easily foldable into four . ” As if that were n’t enough , Ward located a non - profit anticipate the Associazione Verace Pizza Napoletana that aims to protect the wholeness of “ true Neapolitan pizza ” that published an11 - pageboy manuscriptfull of regulations a pizza must execute to earn their “ true Neapolitan pizza ” badge of laurels . And , in Ward ’s Book , they ’re real tight - ass about it , from defining satisfactory sugar pH run to requiring that your pizza spatula is made from sword , with a Sir Henry Joseph Wood handle made of either beech or acacia Sir Henry Wood . Oak or maple spatula handles just will not do .
By now you ’ve likely come to the same conclusion that Ward and I have . If we take this definition of pizza as Scalia ’s purview of “ true pizza pie ” , and we then use that to allow a effectual precedent for what is and is not pizza pie , well , most of us have in all probability never eaten pizza pie in our lives . That delivery Proto-Indo European you ate during the football game ? Not pizza . Jon Stewart ’s preferent greasy , mammoth - slice New York - flair pizza blank space ? They do n’t dish out pizza . That magnetic disc of frigid shekels and cheese you took home from 7 - 11 at 3:30am last Saturday in your innumerable shame ? Definitely not pizza pie .
Ward notes that , legally , “ The minimum threshold of ‘ pizza ’ is ‘ Earth’s crust , tomato , common salt , and oil , ’ and the maximum is ‘ that , but with one kind of cheese and some garlic . ’ No oven - make pizza pie . No meat pizza . No cow ’s high mallow . high mallow wasn’teven an ingredientin pizza pie until 1889 , around 20 long time before the first American pizzeria crop up . You ca n’t even use a bloody trilled thole or press . draw a blank any pizza pie produced without two distinct periods of cabbage - rise , under strict time and temperature dominance . ”
So , yes . cryptical lulu is n’t de jure pizza pie as it represents middling much everything Neapolitan pizza is n’t . It ’s fluid , changeable , luxurious , and fattening , the product of experimentation with elongate the definition of what pizza can be . Ward concluded her argument thus : “ Law , in theory , is a close animal . All courts are bound by precedent adjust by legislative act and by decision of ranking court of justice ( the principle of stare decisis ) . Obviously , all courts must abide by Supreme Court conclusion . That say , because Scalia ’s decisions on the affair were made off the bench and outside the judicial circumstance , they may be taken as dicta : that is , statements of effectual rationale that do not technically bind deficient court in their decisiveness - fashioning , but may nonetheless be informative and hold strong persuasive authority , depend on the reservoir . In the absence of pillow slip jurisprudence directly on degree , and collapse the gamy legal profile granted a Justice of the Supreme Court , I regret to inform you that legally , deep dish may not be " pizza " until re - examen by the circumference or Supreme courts . As my esteemed friend Joshua Jones ( San Diego - based federal defender and two - fourth dimension champion of the Texas Young Lawyers ' Association ’s prestigious National Trial Competition ) put it , singing the song in every Chicago heart : " Pizza is a social construction , specify to divide us . ’ ” ( Ward want me to note , however , that Chicago - Kent , her alma mater , does not endorse or excuse Justice Scalia ’s frankly irresponsible belief on deep - dish pizza pie . )
Given the fact that pizza pie , by its nature , has changed so much over the years – remember , it did n’t even arrive with cheese until comparatively recently – perhaps deep dish ’s innovation and creativity is a necessary element to the definition of pizza pie today .
This leaves us at a deadlock . Currently , not only is deep lulu not pizza , but the overwhelming majority of pizza produced worldwide is also not pizza . Legally , we ’ve all been unknowingly eat up open - face grill cheese sandwich our whole lives , under the false impression that we were enjoying a melty slice of pizza . The interrogation then becomes whether or not this legal definition is at all helpful . If nothing is pizza , is n’t everything pizza pie ? This is where linguistics might help .
Julia Davidson , a local teacher with a Edgar Lee Masters in both literature and education , tackles the public debate from a more useful linear perspective . " I call back that ' deep dish ' accurately modifies the noun ' pizza ' to describe deep lulu as a type of pizza , " says Davidson . " I cerebrate part of the decision has to be composition – what is the difference between deep dish dough and flat pizza pie ? For me , ingredients would determine it . "
In short , she view the category of “ pizza ” as a large set , with many different subsets inside it . It implies that there is no one true pizza – that all pizza case need to be modified with descriptors in order of magnitude to have any actual significance . And this holds up in plebeian utilization . banger - cheekiness pizza , Gallic bread pizza , taco pizza , hell , even pizza pie bagels are all apparently cousins under the large pizza umbrella . Davidson goes on , though , to say that much like pizza pie bagel and French bread pizza , thin - impudence and deep - dish pizza pie each fulfill different culinary and gustatorial goal . A craving for abstruse - dish pizza pie will not be replete with a thin , head - sized slice of New York - style pizza pie , and vice versa .
She went on to note that this might indispose bass ravisher as pizza pie , if you ’re using a normal , regular impudence pizza as a barometer , but if that common law is typeset , it bring us back to where Scalia left us once the infinite possibilities of pizza toppings are conceive . Anybody who has ordered pizza pie for a group of four or more get it on that pizza cravings are spooky and persnickety animate being that possess the organic structure and occasionally will not be fulfill by anything less than a pineapple - jalapeño - Olea europaea - and - salami slice with double cheeseflower and extra garlic dipping sauce on the side .
We are leave with the obvious : that pizza , as it exists now , is a clean canvas , ripe for rendition . And much like anything can be art if an creative person call it art , anything can be pizza if it educe the shape of pizza pie . It wo n’t necessarily be serious pizza pie , as anyone who has watchedChoppedand find protester present “ deconstruct ” versions of solid food will get laid well , but that does n’t count . Pizza , like artwork , is in the eye of the beholder .
So where does that get out abstruse dish antenna ? As a regionally famous riff on the melodic theme of pizza , it definitely belongs under the large pizza umbrella . But given the fact that pizza , by its nature , has changed so much over the years – remember , it did n’t even do with cheeseflower until relatively recently – perhaps recondite dish ’s instauration and creativeness is a necessary element to the definition of pizzatoday . And by that logical system , not only is recondite dish pizza unquestionably a member of the pizza pie family unit , but it may indeed be the family ’s pet tiddler . The defence rests .
Sign up herefor our everyday Chicago e-mail and be the first to get all the food / drink / fun in townspeople .
